| 13 | 0 | 14 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的 在产品研制过程中,振动环境是设计人员考虑的重要因素,动力学特性能够表征产品抵抗振动环境的能力。传统动力学设计流程依赖试验迭代,设计周期长、成本高。本研究提出一种产品动力学特性人机交互式优化设计方法,为解决此问题提供新思路。方法 产品动力学特性人机交互式优化设计方法融合人、机协同优势,综合利用两者特长,通过人工判读计算机模态振型动画,识别结构在振动环境中的薄弱位置,采用人机交互方式对产品的拓扑结构进行强指向性的迭代优化。本研究采用该方法对一种薄壁结构产品进行优化设计。结果 优化后产品在不增加重量的同时,基频与优化前相比,提高133%,正弦激励下节点响应与优化前相比,降低77%,最大应力与优化前相比,降低94%。优化后产品满足设计要求,优化效果明显。结论 该薄壁结构产品的动力学特性人机交互式优化设计验证了该方法可行、有效,达到了缩短研制周期和节约成本的目的,可为类似产品的优化设计提供参考。
Abstract:Objective In the development of products, vibration environments are critical factors to consider, as the dynamic characteristics of these products reflect their ability to withstand vibrational loads. Traditional dynamic design processes for products rely on experimental iterations, leading to long design cycles and high costs. This study proposes a human-computer interactive optimization design method for the dynamic characteristics of products, offering a potential solution to address these challenges. Methods The proposed method integrates the strengths of both human beings and computers, leveraging their respective expertise. By manually interpreting computer-generated modal animation results, structural weaknesses under vibrational loads are identified. Subsequently, a human-computer interactive approach is employed to iteratively optimize the product's topology with strong directional guidance. This method was applied to optimize a thin-walled cylindrical product currently under development. Results After optimization, the product's fundamental frequency increased by 133% without weight gain. Under sinusoidal excitation, node response decreased by 77% and maximum stress decreased by 94% compared to the pre-optimization state. The optimized product meets design requirements with significant improvement. Conclusion The human-computer interactive optimization method for dynamic characteristics has been successfully validated through this thin-walled product. This approach is both feasible and effective, achieving the goal of reducing design cycles and costs which can be served as valuable references for optimizing similar products.
[1]SINGH DD, SAMIRA SA, BHANDIWAD V, et al. Design and analysis of vibration fixture for aerospace heat exchanger[J]. J Vib Eng Technol,2024, 12:5609-5624. DOI:10.1007/s42417-023-01203-0.
[2]马兴瑞,于登云,韩增尧,等.星箭力学环境分析与试验技术进展[J].宇航学报, 2006, 27(3):323-331. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-1328.2006.03.001.
[3]GARCIA-PEREZ A, SORRIBES-PALMER F, ALONSO G, et al.Overview and application of FEM methods for analysis in space instruments[J]. Aerosp Sci Technol, 2018, 80:572-586. DOI:10.1016/j.ast.2018.07.035.
[4]HEMANTH J, YOGESH KB. Finite element analysis(FEA)and thermal gradient of a solid rectangular fin with embossing’s for aerospace applications[J]. Aerosp Sci Technol, 2018, 3:49-60.DOI:10.4236/aast.2018.33004.
[5]庞岩,刘向阳,贺双喜.气密轴承接触活动性能的有限元建模[J].航天医学与医学工程, 2017, 30(4):292-297. DOI:10.16289/j.cnki.1002-0837.2017.04.011.
[6]刘东岳,王荣青,刘俊兵,等.基于参数化建模分析方法的舱外服关节活动特性研究[J].航天医学与医学工程, 2025, 36(2):96-100.DOI:10.16289/j.cnki.1002-0837.2025.02002.
[7]程昌,范开春,郭辉荣.航天器整流罩结构优化设计[J].机械设计与制造, 2013, 8:48-50. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3997.2013.08.015.
[8]马爱军,石蒙,刘洪英,等.舱外航天服不同装夹状态下有限元分析及试验验证[J].航天医学与医学工程, 2018, 31(2):261-263.DOI:10.16289/j.cnki.1002-0837.2018.02.024
[9]廖文和,戴宁.航空航天结构轻量化设计制造技术发展现状与挑战[J].南京航空航天大学学报, 2023, 55(3):347-360.DOI:10.16356/j.1005.
[10]孙海文,胥磊.某火箭模态分析与模态试验[J].兵器装备工程学报, 2017, 38(6):176-179. DOI:10.11809/scbgxb2017.06.038.
[11]陈珅艳,黄海,王利民.人机交互的航天器结构优化设计[J].计算力学学报, 2004, 21(4):510-512. DOI:10.7511/jslx20044091.
[12]刘勇,陈斌,罗峰. OptiStruct结构分析与工程应用[M].北京:机械工业出版社, 2021:79-87.
基本信息:
DOI:10.16289/j.cnki.1002-0837.2026.01007
中图分类号:TB472
引用信息:
[1]刘磊,程冬建,彭扬林,等.一种薄壁结构产品动力学特性优化设计仿真研究[J].航天医学与医学工程,2026,37(01):34-38.DOI:10.16289/j.cnki.1002-0837.2026.01007.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(No.52406116)
2025-02-23
2025
2025-09-30
2025
1
2026-02-25
2026-02-25